Propaganda by Edward Bernays

Propaganda by Edward Bernays | sorinadumitru.com

Introduction

First published in November 1928, Propaganda by Edward Bernays is regarded as a cornerstone in the study of public relations and mass communication. Bernays shows us how modern democratic societies rely on shaping public opinion via organized persuasion. He refers to it as an essential tool, not inherently negative, but a tool for organizing chaos and guiding collective decisions.

Propaganda by Edward Bernays Summary

1. Organizing Chaos

Bernays asserts that mass society depends on a small group of “invisible governors”. These are experts who shape public opinion and habits to maintain democratic function. Without them, voters and consumers would be lost in all the complexity.

Political parties and PR narrow complex societal choices into manageable options.

Advances in communication reinforce shared but scattered ideas across varied social groups.

2. Invisible Governors

In Propaganda by Edward Bernays, the author expands on who exactly these “invisible governors” are. He argues that these “invisible” influencers effectively engineer consent. He emphasizes how propaganda can serve capitalism more than democracy. Propaganda taps into the audience’s hidden motives. Propaganda uses emotional responses to limit choices, thereby eliciting quick enthusiastic reactions. A story must be emotionally engaging, otherwise who cares?

3. Case Studies

Propaganda by Edward Bernays makes heavy use of case studies as follows:

1. Women’s Rights

  • Objective: Shift public perception of women’s role in society and normalize new behaviors for women.
  • Method: He describes how orchestrated events, symbolic acts, and media coverage can rapidly change cultural norms.
  • Example: His real-life “Torches of Freedom” campaign (for the American Tobacco Company) doubled as a women’s liberation statement. It framed smoking in public as a symbol of independence. Even though it was commercially motivated, it demonstrated how aligning a cause (women’s emancipation) with an action (smoking) could break social taboos.
  • Takeaway: Causes can be made compelling by linking them to emotionally charged symbols and moments.

2. Education

  • Objective: Promote public investment and belief in educational reform and lifelong learning.
  • Method: Use respected figures such as educators, scientists or even philanthropists to frame education as essential to national progress. Amplify their statements through media outlets such as newspapers, radio and even public events.
  • Example: Bernays outlines how educational campaigns can influence not only policy but also parental attitudes. Campaigns can emphasize the value of modern curricula or vocational training.
  • Takeaway: Education reform is easier to achieve when the public sees it not only as a personal benefit but also as a patriotic duty.

Why it Matters

1. Democratic Stability

Bernays argues propaganda is not actually subversive, but essential in living well within a democracy, helping people navigate the complexity.

2. Invisible Influence

A small cadre shapes masses through subtle psychological and social levers. This is also proven by The Asch conformity experiments.

3. Applied Persuasion

The book provides examples where propaganda aligned with progressive aims. A democracy is, or should be, continuously evolving. Proper communication helps with smooth transitions.

4. Ethical Tension

Bernays brings up the duality of propaganda. He advocates persuasion as both necessary and potentially manipulative. In any type of political regime, there are only half-truths.

Propaganda by Edward Bernays Key Takeaways

1. Propaganda is inevitable in modern society.

In a complex, interconnected world like the one we’re living in today, bombarded by information from all sides, people can’t process all information just by themselves. Organized persuasion is unavoidable.

2. The “Invisible Government” runs on influence.

A small group of specialists we could classify as public relations experts, media figures and even business leaders actually shape public opinion. If something elicits an emotional response, it was designed to do so.

3. Engineering consent is a skill.

Propaganda is about deliberately shaping perceptions and behaviors through planned campaigns, not accidental influence.

4. Emotions drive decisions more than logic.

Instead of relying solely on facts, successful persuasion taps into feelings, desires, and subconscious motives. If it were to only rely on logic, there would be no conclusion and no actionable next steps.

5. Democracy relies on managing public opinion.

Bernays saw propaganda as essential to democracy because it organizes chaos into a unified action.

6. Propaganda serves businesses and politics alike.

Corporations and governments both use the same techniques. Recognizable branding, clear slogans or engaging events. These are meant to sway mass behavior.

7. Media is the delivery vehicle for influence.

In the past, newspapers, radio and film were the media channels. Nowadays coordinated messages are delivered and amplified through news websites and, most importantly, social media in which communication is extensively simplified.

8. Ethics are context dependant.

Propaganda can be used for social good (education, public health) or harm (war mongering, manipulation), depending on the motive.

9. Public relations is propaganda in practice.

Bernays essentially rebrands propaganda as a professional discipline. Today we call this PR.

Conclusion

I know the word “propaganda” has a negative connotation because of the way it was used in modern history to justify genocide. However, if you’re living in a society, any type of political regime, the information you think you know as facts is probably a result of tactical propaganda. Some things keep you pleased, some things keep you distracted from other things you shouldn’t be paying attention to.

What is most insteresting is what I found in The Oxford Handbook on Political Psychology.

The authors raise a thesis in one of the chapters regarding the correlation between political orientation and ethnicity. After decades of research, the conclusion was that ethnicity plays no part in our political preferences. These are shaped by our upbringing, our education and the way we’ve been socialized. And no, there is no racial differentiation within the human species. So relax.

Sources

Leave a Reply